Use case

Targeting moved into the ad. Creative is the audience now.

Broad delivery means the system decides who sees what by reading the creative and the response to it. The ad has become the targeting lever. Running four of them is choosing four audiences. Here is how the skill moved, what the win rate says about sample size, how one take becomes a dozen audiences, and what it costs to kill a loser on Wednesday.

Person browsing Instagram over coffee, relaxed morning vibe.
Photo by Mayara Caroline Mombelli on Pexels
Creatives that carry spend, per Motion
5-8%
One finished thirty second ad
110 CR
Finished ads a month on Premium
45

The interest checkbox left and the creative took its job

Media buyers used to express an audience with settings.

Age bands, interests, layered exclusions, a saved audience with a name that made sense to whoever built it.

Delivery on Meta now leans broad.

The system works out who to show an ad to largely from the creative and the early response to it.

The audience is inferred rather than declared.

Which relocates the entire skill. A hook about being tired at 4pm finds tired people.

A hook about a spreadsheet finds people with a spreadsheet problem.

Those are audience decisions written as sentences.

So an account with four creatives is not an account testing four ads.

It is an account addressing four audiences and hoping one of them is large.

Take your best performing ad and read its first line. Then describe the person it would find. That description is your real targeting document.

  • Every hook is an audience definition written in plain language
  • Four live creatives is four audiences, regardless of how the campaigns are structured
  • The system needs variation to learn from, and four gives it almost nothing

A 5 to 8 percent win rate is an argument about sample size, not taste

Published benchmarks put the share of ad creatives that become winners at roughly 5 to 8 percent.

That comes from Motion's analysis of 550,000+ Meta ads. One in thirteen to one in twenty.

Six creatives a month against that rate is a lottery with six tickets.

The monthly review where you argue about which hook was weak is a meeting about sampling error.

Nothing in a better brief fixes it.

Sharper writing moves the odds a little. Twenty-six attempts moves them a lot.

Only one of those is available to a team that produces six.

The useful reframe for a review is that the villain is arithmetic rather than anybody's creativity.

That is checkable, and it moves the conversation to the only lever that works.

Twenty-six creatives at the published rate

Two carry the spend. Shipping six a month means drawing six tiles and calling the result a strategy.

Winners at 5 to 8 percentCreatives that did not carry spend

This is the whole editor

Highlight a phrase and a clip lands on those exact words. No timeline, no keyframes, no layers.

CLIPS · 5I have thisexact conversationeverysingle week. Somebody sits down and says,oh yeah, I takecinnamonevery day.And honestly, doc, I have no idea if it works.So let me tell you what isin that capsule.a clip lands on these wordscut from the editTAKING CINNAMONEVERY DAY?is it doing anythingHeadlineMusicCaptionsTHIS VIDEOLength25.0sClips5Words removed18Export video

One take becomes a dozen audiences by rewriting the first line

Film one talking-head take of up to three minutes.

Upload it and Cutroom transcribes the read, drafts the cut, places b-roll against the words and returns a finished 9:16 MP4 with captions burned in.

You direct on the transcript. Highlight a phrase and a clip lands over exactly those words.

Delete a line and the cut rebuilds. Change the pace and it re-cuts the whole thing.

For Meta specifically, the variant that matters is the opening.

Same body, twelve different first sentences, each aimed at a different situation the viewer might be in.

That is twelve audience definitions produced from one filming session, at about 110 credits each.

There is no timeline, no keyframes and no layers, so a variant is a decision rather than an afternoon.

Your own product footage sits in the workspace library and drops onto the words that name it.

Exports are 9:16, which covers Reels and Stories. Feed and right column placements are made elsewhere.

One take into twelve audiences

  1. Film the body once

    Up to 3 minutes

  2. Batch per variant

    100 CR each

  3. Rewrite the opening

    Delete a line, re-cut

  4. Export

    9:16 MP4, 20 CR per output minute

Kill on Wednesday, not on Friday, because the attempt cost almost nothing

The second effect of a cheap attempt is not more ads. It is faster deletions.

An ad that cost six hundred dollars has a defender in the room.

It runs until somebody is willing to lose face.

At about 110 credits, nobody defends anything.

The creative that is not working goes off on Wednesday afternoon with no conversation.

That is the behaviour every testing guide asks for and almost nobody manages.

Basic is $39.99 for 2,500 credits, roughly 22 ads. Premium is $79.99 for 5,000, roughly 45.

A $15 top-up adds 1,000 credits when a week runs hot.

The trial is 7 days and 300 credits with no card, which is two finished ads to run against whatever is currently winning.

Set a kill rule before anything goes live and write it down.

Finished ads a month, by plan

  • Trial, 300 credits2 ads
  • Basic, $39.9922 ads
  • Premium, $79.9945 ads

What lands in the ads manager, and what carries your brand

Exports are 9:16 MP4. That covers Reels and Stories placements, which is where vertical video earns its keep.

Square and widescreen assets for feed placements are produced elsewhere.

The source is one talking-head take capped at three minutes, and one project makes one finished ad.

Static image creative, carousels and catalogue ads are outside this entirely.

The b-roll search covers millions of free clips for the world around the claim.

Your product, your interface and your own footage go into the workspace library.

From there they land under the exact words that describe them, with one highlight.

The caption treatment is your look, across six packs plus colour, weight, size and position.

In a muted feed that treatment is most of what a viewer registers as brand, and it costs no design round.

Somebody has to be on camera, because the transcript is the interface.

That person is also the reason broad delivery can read the ad at all. A face making a specific claim is the strongest signal the system gets.

Questions people ask

How many creatives should be live at once?
More than most accounts run. Against a 5 to 8 percent winner rate, a dozen distinct openings is where results become readable. Twelve at about 110 credits is roughly 1,320 credits.
Does it make square or feed-shaped assets?
No. Every export is 9:16 MP4, which fits Reels and Stories. Feed and right column placements need assets produced elsewhere.
What should change between variants?
The opening line, most of the time. It is the part that defines who the ad finds, and changing it here is a transcript edit rather than a rebuild.
Who should not use this?
Advertisers whose Meta creative is entirely static or catalogue-driven. For vertical talking-head video, which is what broad delivery reads best, nothing turns twelve openings around faster.

Twelve openings from one filming session, live by Friday, for about 1,320 credits. Every other production route prices those twelve as twelve videos.

Start with one take300 free credits · no card · cancel anytime